Step 1: Think about the rationale

In this step we think about if we want to conduct a systematic review

Why should we do an evidence synthesis

  • Identify gaps
  • establish an evidence base for best-practice guidance
  • help inform policymakers and practitioners

Topic

For the creation of a systematic review you obviously need a topic Possible topics for systematic reviews - Conditions, categories and measures - Rates and trends - Correlates - Predictors - Causes and effects - Cost effectiveness - Comparative effectiveness - Generalizability

Determine the type of review

You need to think about what type of synthesis you want to do. - Depends on time, resources, aim, depth required

Systematic review

A systematic review attempts to identify, appraise and synthesize all the empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. The purpose of a systematic review is to provide a meticulous summary of all available primary evidence on a research question.

Key charateristicts: - A clearly stated set of objectives - Pre-defined eligibility criteria for studies - A explicit, reproducible methodology - A systematic search that attempts to identify all studies that would meet the eligibility - Assessment of the validity of the findings - A systematic presentation and synthesis of the characteristics and findings

Problems of synthesis studies

Heterogeneity

  • Synthesis studies suffer from heterogeneity, that is the differences between the studies

Publication bias

  • All synthesis studies have a publication bias to some degree
  • You can use a funnel plot to have a look

Sensitivity analysis

Usually certain studies with lower quality are exluded. Does this change the results

Look for existing reviews and asses their quality

Look on pubmed/cochrane and so on

Think about the potential use of the synthesis

Example types of outputs of evidence synthesis

  • Systematic reviews
  • Policy brief
  • Clinical practice guidelines