Step 1: Think about the rationale
In this step we think about if we want to conduct a systematic review
Why should we do an evidence synthesis
- Identify gaps
- establish an evidence base for best-practice guidance
- help inform policymakers and practitioners
Topic
For the creation of a systematic review you obviously need a topic Possible topics for systematic reviews - Conditions, categories and measures - Rates and trends - Correlates - Predictors - Causes and effects - Cost effectiveness - Comparative effectiveness - Generalizability
Determine the type of review
You need to think about what type of synthesis you want to do. - Depends on time, resources, aim, depth required
Systematic review
A systematic review attempts to identify, appraise and synthesize all the empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. The purpose of a systematic review is to provide a meticulous summary of all available primary evidence on a research question.
Key charateristicts: - A clearly stated set of objectives - Pre-defined eligibility criteria for studies - A explicit, reproducible methodology - A systematic search that attempts to identify all studies that would meet the eligibility - Assessment of the validity of the findings - A systematic presentation and synthesis of the characteristics and findings
Problems of synthesis studies
Heterogeneity
- Synthesis studies suffer from heterogeneity, that is the differences between the studies
Publication bias
- All synthesis studies have a publication bias to some degree
- You can use a funnel plot to have a look
Sensitivity analysis
Usually certain studies with lower quality are exluded. Does this change the results
Look for existing reviews and asses their quality
Look on pubmed/cochrane and so on
Think about the potential use of the synthesis
Example types of outputs of evidence synthesis
- Systematic reviews
- Policy brief
- Clinical practice guidelines